Thoughts On Bush War 3: The US-Iran War September 26, 2006
Thank you, Mr. David Lindorff:
Ordinarily one would say that the real sign of an imminent attack would be a convening of Congress to consider a use of force authorization, or perhaps an attempt in the United Nations to win endorsement for an attack from the UN Security Council, but clearly this is not happening.
And for good reason.
Bush would never succeed in winning Security Council approval for a military action against Iran, particularly after embarrassing and insulting the council members by the massive lying that he did the last time he sought such a vote–for an attack on Iraq–in 2003.
Nor would he likely be given the go-ahead by Congress this time around, with all of the House and a third of the Senate facing re-election on November 7 by an electorate that has grown weary of war, angry at a half trillion dollars wasted, and sick at heart about the thousands of flag-draped coffins and broken GIs returning home, with nothing to show for it all but two dysfunctional, war-torn former countries in the Middle East.
At issue is the obvious war exercises going on in and around Iran (see Mr. Lindorff’s The Nation article for detail and analysis).
Another Bush War? Is it more sickening or frightening? I can’t even fathom another budgetary catastrophe as such. I couldn’t have said it better than Mr. Lindorff.








Leave a Reply